![]() 04/12/2015 at 19:18 • Filed to: None | ![]() | ![]() |
This might be the perfect cruiser.
Newer 745 with all the expensive, unreliable bits replaced with a much more fun and reliable setup.
!!! UNKNOWN CONTENT TYPE !!!
![]() 04/12/2015 at 19:33 |
|
Where did they get a 4.8L LSx???
But way cool.
![]() 04/12/2015 at 19:49 |
|
That little guy is referred to as the LR-4 or LY-2, and came in the following:
LR4 applications:
2003–2006 Chevrolet Express / GMC Savana
1999–2006 Chevrolet Silverado / GMC Sierra 1500
2000–2006 Chevrolet Tahoe / GMC Yukon
LY2 applications:
2008–2009 Chevrolet Express / GMC Savana
2007–2009 Chevrolet Silverado
2007–2009 Chevrolet Tahoe
2007–2009 GMC Sierra
2007–2009 GMC Yukon
![]() 04/12/2015 at 20:10 |
|
While the gremlins might be gone, I wouldn't call weekly total transmission failure more reliable. Seriously, unless that 4L60 is completely built, it will die at least twice a year if the car is driven once a week. Ours couldn't handle 270hp/275ft.lbs. for 40k miles(wasn't isolated, second factory trans went at 80k), so I'm positive this won't be able to handle the fuckloads of torque that set-up has.
![]() 04/12/2015 at 20:17 |
|
Ah em
![]() 04/12/2015 at 20:19 |
|
See, I've worked on LSx engines for almost 10 years, and never had I heard of one smaller than the 5.3 Learn something new every day...
I guess it helps that I avoid all vehicles matching that list.
![]() 04/12/2015 at 20:32 |
|
If those wheels were 2 in smaller, they would look great.
I question the need for a custom turbo setup. LS upgrades are pretty cheap.
![]() 04/12/2015 at 20:34 |
|
All iron at that size.
I'm looking for a 5.3 aluminum version (usually a trailblazer ss) to swap into an import.
![]() 04/12/2015 at 20:35 |
|
I think the turbo is to make up for the lack of displacement?
![]() 04/12/2015 at 20:37 |
|
I think it's there becausr turbo.
Most LS mods swap easily.
![]() 04/12/2015 at 20:39 |
|
You know we love us some iron! W00t!
![]() 04/12/2015 at 20:39 |
|
Maybe it would be better with one of the newer, plentiful GM autos?
![]() 04/12/2015 at 20:53 |
|
You can settle for the RPO LM7 5.3. It's a cast iron block with aluminum heads and cheaper than the SS block.
![]() 04/12/2015 at 21:00 |
|
Or... T56?
![]() 04/12/2015 at 21:03 |
|
for boost it may be a wise use of an extra 150#
![]() 04/12/2015 at 21:06 |
|
I'm scheming this toward a 87 Conquest with a massive turbo 4. For the sake a vanity and front spring rate, i would love the LS to come in close to the same weight. All aluminum, i think i can do it.
I would also dump the recirculating ball box for rack and pinion so i just might pull it off.
![]() 04/12/2015 at 21:25 |
|
You're not really tacking on mass with the ls. A bmw inline six weighs more than a ls motor for example. You could turbo the 5.3 and it won't complain.
![]() 04/12/2015 at 21:30 |
|
I can agrer with you on weight, but custom turbo (especially this custom turbo) looks a lot like vanity.